top of page
RiffLogo final.png

Cannes 2026: Artists’ Cinema

Bitter Christmas (Pedro Almodóvar, 2026)
Bitter Christmas (Pedro Almodóvar, 2026)

As the recalled titles for the Cannes awards ceremony began circulating hours before the closing ceremony, the festival’s guessing game entered its most suspenseful phase. It happens every year. This time, the shortlist reportedly included Fjord, Minotaur, Fatherland, The Black Ball, The Dreamed Adventure, A Man of His Time, All of a Sudden, and Coward. These eight films would ultimately divide the festival’s seven major awards. Either a tie would emerge in one category, or Cannes might once again create a special distinction for a particular film, as it had done for The Seed of the Sacred Fig in 2024 and Bi Gan’s Resurrection in 2025.

 

Until shortly before the awards ceremony began in the evening, journalists and critics continued to publish predictions. Meanwhile, a vast legion of cinephiles who weren’t even in Cannes took to social media for a virtual Cannes experience and weighed in with their own forecasts, often relying on jury grids by numerous outlets or reviews from critics whose tastes aligned with theirs. This phenomenon further underscores the inherent game nature of the awards mechanism—it is as rich in dramatic tension as it is in interactivity.

 

The final results were hardly surprising. Romanian filmmaker Cristian Mungiu claimed a second Palme d’Or with Fjord, nearly two decades after winning with 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days in 2007. Russian director Andrey Zvyagintsev, now based in France, received the Grand Prix for Minotaur. Best Director was shared by Paweł Pawlikowski for Fatherland and the directing duo Javier Ambrossi and Javier Calvo for The Black Ball. Whether such a lineup possesses credibility remains, as always, a matter of individual judgment.

 

Yet the significance of Cannes has never rested solely on its prize winners. As the world’s most influential film festival, its value emerges from the totality of the works it presents. Together, these films tell stories about individuals while simultaneously reflecting the condition of the contemporary world.



Artists’ Cinema

 

Across its Official Selection and parallel sections—including Directors’ Fortnight, Critics’ Week, and ACID—the 79th Cannes Film Festival screened 122 feature films. Among them, the 22 titles competing for the Palme d’Or represent the highest-profile showcase of contemporary auteur cinema. What is striking is that at least thirteen of these twenty-two competition films place artists at the center of their narratives, either as protagonists or as essential mediators through which the story unfolds.

 

The first competition title, Fukada Koji’s Nagi Notes, revolves in part around Yoriko (Matsu Takako), a sculptor whose reunion with an old friend, Yuri (Ishibashi Shizuka), quietly sets two emotional trajectories in motion. Yoriko’s studio is filled with wooden portraits carved from live models, yet one sculpture hidden beneath a cloth is modelled after Yuri herself. Through sculpture, Yoriko materialises feelings she chose not to openly express, creating a vessel for emotions otherwise left without form. It is a strategy common to artists across many of this year’s films. Novelists use writing to observe and intervene in the lives of those they study, as in Asghar Farhadi’s Parallel Tales. Photographers turn the camera toward their objects of desire, as in Arthur Harari’s The Unknown and Marie Kreutzer’s Gentle Monster. Film directors write friends and family members into their scripts in search of reconciliation, as in Rodrigo Sorogoyen’s The Beloved and Pedro Almodóvar’s Bitter Christmas. At its core, artistic creation repeatedly appears as a form of fulfilment, even possession, achieved through fiction.


Nagi Notes (Fukada Koji , 2026)
Nagi Notes (Fukada Koji , 2026)

Bitter Christmas goes further by examining the way artworks can turn back upon their creators. This dimension emerges through Almodóvar’s elegantly structured screenplay. Within the film, director Raúl (Leonardo Sbaraglia) and the fictional filmmaker Elsa (Barbara Lennie), a character created by Raúl himself, simultaneously engage in acts of writing. Their narratives mirror and interrogate one another. Near the conclusion, just as Raúl finally discovers a way of writing about friends and family that feels both morally defensible and formally satisfying, he smiled. The camera immediately cuts to Elsa sitting on a sofa, gazing at him with something close to judgment. In that moment, the artist’s authority dissolves. By his twenty-fourth feature, Almodóvar appears to have redirected his critical gaze toward himself.

 

A second group of films focuses on the precarious conditions of artistic existence. In Jeanne Herrys Another Day, Adèle Exarchopoulos plays a struggling actress trapped by alcoholism. In Hamaguchi Ryusuke’s All of a Sudden, theatre director Mari (Okamoto Tao) continues pursuing seemingly impossible productions while dying of cancer. Ira Sachs’s The Man I Love follows an AIDS-stricken artist, played by Oscar winner Rami Malek, navigating friendships, family ties and a complicated love triangle in 1980s New York. Even Thomas Mann in Fatherland, though spared immediate material hardship, finds himself caught between competing ideological camps eager to transform him into a symbolic figure. His son has already sought posthumous vindication through suicide, while his daughter, his closest companion, never hesitates to challenge him directly.

 

Other films feature artists less prominently, yet their presence remains crucial to the narrative. Charline Bourgeois-Tacquet’s A Woman’s Life deconstructs the life of a surgeon (Léa Drucker) into a dozen episodic chapters, a clever device that sidesteps the pitfalls of conventional dramatic structure. In several pivotal chapters, the surgeon meets her temporary true love—a novelist whose creative premise involves observing the surgeon’s life. She is possessed within the writer’s literary imagination, only for the novelist to vanish the moment he secures a Japanese writing grant. The Black Ball, inspired by Federico García Lorca’s unfinished work of the same name, gradually drifts into fiction. Lorca’s late-life companion Rafael Rodríguez Rapún enters the narrative, which imagines a secret emotional bond developing between the imprisoned Rapún and one of his guards during the Spanish Civil War. In the twenty-first century, the guard’s grandson attempts to reconstruct both the lost manuscript and the hidden love story buried within it. Kore-eda Hirokazu’s Sheep in the Box moves into the future, imagining a world where artificial intelligence can resurrect the dead. The architect played by Ayase Haruka spends her life designing ideal homes for others, while her AI-empowered son develops his own vision of home through accelerated learning, ultimately constructing an entirely new one for himself.

 

These films may point toward a tendency worth scrutinizing. Cinema, by virtue of the camera, is built upon a relationship between observer and observed. However, as an increasing number of directors choose to place the artist—a proxy for themselves—into the position of the observed, one may wonder whether contemporary cinema risks becoming trapped in a closed circuit of self-reference. At its worst, it can slide into a form of artistic narcissism. The tendency arguably reached an extreme two years ago with Christophe Honoré’s Marcello Mio. When Chiara Mastroianni plays her father Marcello Mastroianni and Catherine Deneuve plays Chiara’s mother, the film ultimately becomes a fully internalized act of cinematic fan fiction, no longer a window onto the world beyond itself.




Comments


bottom of page